Monday, September 12, 2011

Pick of the Day from my RSS feed-Reducing Metal-Metal Friction_an InnoCentive Challenge

Reducing Metal–Metal Friction 

Call for the attention of  metallurgists, materials scientist and coatings specialist:
NB. If I can be of any assistance please do not hesitate to get in touch.

AWARD: $10,000 USD | DEADLINE: 10/30/11 or 30 Oct 2011  | ACTIVE SOLVERS: 170  | POSTED: 8/30/11 or 30 Aug 2011.


The Challenge is to find a treatment that can reduce the Coefficient of Friction on stainless steel metal parts. It will be a bonus if the solution is applicable to Titanium, Aluminum and other ferrous and non-ferrous alloys. The solution could be a coating or a surface treatment.

This Challenge requires only a written proposal.

Challenge Overview

Metal to metal friction in small manufactured devices causes many problems like galling and eventually wearing out and failure of parts. The Seeker is looking for a durable treatment or coating that can reduce the Coefficient of Friction (COF) in a Metal-Metal system with various Alloys of SS, Ti and Al. Any solution must not affect the strength of the base metal.

To receive an award, the Solvers will not have to transfer their exclusive IP rights to the Seeker. Instead, they will grant to the Seeker non-exclusive license to practice their solutions.

This is a Theoretical Challenge that requires only a written proposal to be submitted. The Challenge award will be contingent upon theoretical evaluation of the proposal by the Seeker.

Call for the attention of metallurgists, materials scientist and coatings specialist:
NB. If I can be of any assistance please do not hesitate to get in touch.

Sincerely yours in materials science and engineering

Sunday, September 11, 2011

Energy Sustainability Tops EPSRC List of Six Global Research Challenges

As my two previous posts have shown energy sustainability remains a primary consideration. It tops the Engineering and Physical Science Research Council (EPSRC) list of

SIX GLOBAL RESEARCH CHALLENGES to be ADDRESSED:
1.Energy
2.Digital economy,
3. Manufacturing the future,
4. Healthcare technologies,
5. Living with environmental change
6. Global uncertainties.

Energy sustainability and better renewable energy topics are one of the main motivators for my blogging activity. I shall continue to address such topics at the risk of being boring.

Such is the importance of this subject and the quality of Energy Initiatives WW that one may safely "assess risk" (another challenge) of  boredom to be small or insignificant? Here I shall add the MIT Energy Initiative to my RSS feed to the blog. To consult this feed please scroll down to the blog footer blocks.  Let me draw readers attention for example to a recent advance in the form of Sun-Free-Photovoltaics

Among the many useful features in the MIT-EI figure an extensive video series both visual and script version. video series both visual and script

Saturday, September 10, 2011

Foresight-Hindsight in Materials Science and Engineering _Project Portfolio Management

Following my last post “ Selection Criteria for Research Project Funding,” 8 Sept. 2011, let us continue our “Foresight –Hindsight” (marketing) exercise using a short presentation using a modified BCG matrix (4 squares)or  GE/McKinsey matrix(9 squares) chart

The chart which I wish to draw to the attention of my metallurgical and materials scientist friends,  members of  The Institute was originally published in Materials World    and archived in my personal files for more than a decade.  Cf. Image 1 below.   It is a nine square GE/McKinsey matrix.

-Areas of Attractiveness are represented by 3 colums- (vertical axis):  1. Emerging,2. Intermediate and 3. Key priority areas, of increasing attractiveness 1 to 3.
-Areas of Feasibility are represented by position on the horizontal axis :  increasing feasibility from left to right.
Within this matrix the upper most right hand square is magnified and again divided into another 9 square matrix, “Attractiveness versus Feasibility”.  Such a process both shows how this approach can be usefully refined while pragmatically bringing focus to the necessary couple, Key Priorities which are Feasible.  Clear objectives can be given and so motivation increased.  The challenges of the research for excellence are respected and the likelihood of impact in appropriate areas increased.
The presentation allows the representation of 9 blocks IE GE/McKinsey presentation.
The arc through the intermediate and emerging  themes draws attention to the fact that the most-attractive and desireable does not always correspond to the most feasible.
Many of the themes presented in the previous post "Selection Criteria for Research Funding" EPSRC 2010 - 2013 have previously figured in the BCG - GE/McKinsey Matrix approach established at least a decade earlier (Image 1) An attempt to show this continuing preoccupation with certain themes is shown in the table below in bold characters. One reason for this is the wide nature of themes cf previous post headings:

THREE WIDE FOCUS THEMES TO IMPACT UPON.
THREE STRATEGIC GOALS.
SIX GLOBAL RESEARCH CHALLENGES to be ADDRESSED

<><><>  <><><><>   <>

KEY
PRIORITY AREAS
Health & Life Style
Optical Tech.
Genetic &
Biomolecular Eng.,
Bioinformatics, Communication
with machines, Telerepresentation/
multimedia,
Sensors &
sensory information processing,
Software Eng.,
Security &
privacy tech

INTER-
MEDIATE
AREAS
Risk assessment
& management,
Design & Systems Integration,
Chemical &
Biological
Synthesis,



Information
Management,
Modelling &
Simulation, Catalysis,
Work place
& Home.
 Management &
Business                                    Process Eng.,
  Environmentally     sustainable tech.
EMERGING
AREAS
Demographic change, clean processing tech, Energy Tech, LCA,  Automation.

Biomaterials,
Materials Process
& Control,
Materials processing
tech.
                                 Feasibility---------------------->



RELATED POSTS
1. Selection Criteria for Research Project Funding 8 Sept. 20112..
2.Critical Minerals and Metals Defined  12 April 2011.

REFERENCES – EBOOKS on Forsight and Portfolio Management

1.      GE/McKinsey matrix(9 squares) chart
2. Portfolio Management: Fundamental for New Product Success  [pdf]
by Dr. Robert G. Cooper, Dr. Scott J. Edgett and Dr. Elko J. Kleinschmidt,
Reference Paper #12
Compliments of: Stage-Gate International and Product Development Institute Inc
4. Foresight Projects are in-depth studies examining major issues 20-80 years in the future.
5. Selection of research priorities – method of critical technologies by Karel Klusacek [pdf]
Technology Centre of the Academy of Sciences CR Rozvojova 135, 165 02 Prague 6, Czech Republic
6. Crafting a methodology for formation of R and D strategy based on evolutionary epistemology: case study of Iran power industry [pdf]

7. Priority Systems: Technical Terms Used in Project Portfolio Management

9. Stakeholder Identification and Analysis Techniques, John M. Bryson, Hubert H. Humphrey Institute of Public Affairs, 245 Humphrey Center, University of Minnesota [pdf].

NB WARNING TO THE R&D Communities

Thursday, September 8, 2011

Selection Criteria for Research Project Funding

Summary of  UK, Selection Criteria for Research Project Funding by the Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council (EPSRC)


TWO MAJOR MOTIVATORS.

1. Search for Excellence
2. Impact of research results, ie.  the demonstrable  contribution that excellent research makes to society and the economy. To maximise impact goal achievement, routes to success must be envisaged and planned from the project outset.  Potential of Results in the Long Term are evaluated after 4 years.

Excellence will be measured at an International Level and reviewed by peers.

THREE WIDE FOCUS THEMES TO IMPACT UPON.
Impact embraces all the extremely diverse ways research-related knowledge and skills benefit individuals, organisations and nations by –

1. Fostering global economic performance, and specifically national economic competitiveness.
2. Increasing the effectiveness of public services and policy.
3. Enhancing quality of life, health and creative output.


EVALUATION 
Four-year delivery plan sets out priorities and strategies to 2013

EPSRC published a four-year delivery plan setting out our priorities and strategies to 2013.

THREE STRATEGIC GOALS –
1. Shaping capability.
2. Delivering impact.
3. Developing leaders. 


SIX GLOBAL RESEARCH CHALLENGES to be ADDRESSED:
1.Energy
2.Digital economy,
3. Manufacturing the future,
4. Healthcare technologies,
5. Living with environmental change
6. Global uncertainties.

EXAMPLE OF A PARTICULARILY SUCCESSFUL PROJECT.
Full impact may be years away, but the award of the Nobel Prize for Physics 2010 to EPSRC researcher Professor Andre Geim and fellow Russian-born scientist Konstantin Novoselov for their groundbreaking work on the two dimensional material graphene.

REFERENCES.

Saturday, August 13, 2011

Powerful Science Search Engine -WORLDWIDESCIENCE.ORG

Those of my readers who read the previous post will notice that this finding arose from the research done to write the previous post entitled: "Superplasticity - superelasticity


SEARCH SCIENCE
KEY WORDS: 
alloy,superplastic,forming


Superelasticity-Superplasticity Update _Adhoc Introductory Research Notes

Its good to be back on the blog.

This post is motivated by a news item in the R&D section of my professional house journal ,IOM3's Materials World (MW Aug 2011) entitled "High-strength alloy takes the strain" It reports briefly on Tohoku Univ. (Jp)  work on superelastic materials.

Superelastic Effect in Polycrystalline Ferrous Alloys
In superelastic alloys, large deformation can revert to a memorized shape after removing the stress. However, the stress increases with increasing temperature, which limits the practical use over a wide temperature range. Polycrystalline Fe-Mn-Al-Ni shape memory alloys show a small temperature dependence of the superelastic stress because of a small transformation entropy change brought about by a magnetic contribution to the Gibbs energies. For one alloy composition, the superelastic stress varies by 0.53 megapascal/°C over a temperature range from –196 to 240°C.
T. Omori*, K. Ando, M. Okano, X. Xu, Y. Tanaka, I. Ohnuma, R. Kainuma, K. Ishida
Science 1 July 2011: 68-71.


Expanding the Repertoire of Shape Memory Alloys
The exceptional properties of many materials often come at the expense of limited performance in other areas. For example, conventional metals and their alloys are strong—they are good at resisting stress (i.e., an applied load)—but they tolerate only a very small amount of strain (i.e., deformation) before they are 
irreversibly deformed. Rubber can easily return to its original shape, even after large deformations, but is much weaker than conventional metals. However, some metal alloys exhibit “shape memory”; they are strong but can recover from being deformed when heated. This process seems counterintuitive, but these alloys take advantage of solid-to-solid “diffusionless” phase transitions: The atoms rearrange how they pack into crystals in an orderly fashion, and this process changes the material's macroscopic shape. Few other materials possess this combination of strength and flexibility (see the figure), and clever engineering has exploited these properties—for example, in implanted medical devices such as stents. On page 1488 of this issue, Tanaka et al. (1) report on a superelastic alloy that almost doubles the useful range of deformation that can be induced in such alloys.
Ji Ma and Ibrahim Karaman, Science 19 March 2010: 1468-1469.


Ferrous Polycrystalline Shape-Memory Alloy Showing Huge Superelasticity
Shape-memory alloys, such as Ni-Ti and Cu-Zn-Al, show a large reversible strain of more than several percent due to superelasticity. In particular, the Ni-Ti–based alloy, which exhibits some ductility and excellent superelastic strain, is the only superelastic material available for practical applications at present. We herein describe a ferrous polycrystalline, high-strength, shape-memory alloy exhibiting a superelastic strain of more than 13%, with a tensile strength above 1 gigapascal, which is almost twice the maximum superelastic strain obtained in the Ni-Ti alloys. Furthermore, this ferrous alloy has a very large damping capacity and exhibits a large reversible change in magnetization during loading and unloading. This ferrous shape-memory alloy has great potential as a high-damping and sensor material.

Y. Tanaka1, Y. Himuro1, R. Kainuma2,*, Y. Sutou1, T. Omori1 and K. Ishida1,
Science 19 March 2010: Vol. 327 no. 5972 pp. 1488-1490
DOI: 10.1126/science.1183169

MATERIALS SCIENCE
OTHERS WHO REPORTED THESE FINDINGS
  1. Fellow blogger : http://gblogger-metallurgy.blogspot.com/2010/03/ferrous-polycrystalline-shape-memory.html

  1. My professional house journal, IOM3’s Materials World.


FUNDAMENTAL APPROACHES
REVIEWS OF TOPICAL PROBLEMS PACS numbers: 62.20.Fe, 75.30.Kz, 75.80.+q, 81.30.Kf
Shape memory ferromagnets
A N Vasil'ev, V D Buchel'nikov, T Takagi, V V Khovailo, E I Estrin


SEARCH SCIENCE
KEY WORDS: alloy,superplastic,forming

Monday, June 6, 2011

This-Above-All: Geoffrey West On the Scale and Unity of Life from Cells to Cities

This-Above-All: Geoffrey West On the Scale and Unity of Life from Cells to Cities

Just as dimensional analysis [pdf] is a fundamental tool of engineering in getting the right units and checking phenomena so too is scaling fundamental to coming to grips with complex systems.